Skip to content
Insporta Book
en

Triathlon · Level 8: Expert · Sub-level 8.5

Sensors and Measurement Science

10 tests · 100 facts · updated 12 October 2026 · markdown

How to trust the numbers: validity, reliability and error, running power, core temperature, continuous glucose monitors, muscle oxygen sensors, sweat testing, lactate measurement, wearable heart rate, satellite and speed sensors, and how to read sports science evidence.

Each test below is ten questions on Insporta. The list under a test is what the questions check: one fact per question, with the source it was written from. Read it before the test, or come back from a wrong answer.

Test 1Validity, Reliability and ErrorTake a test

  1. Validity is agreement with a criterion or gold-standard measure.

    Source: Atkinson & Nevill, Sports Med 1998 · recall

  2. A reliable device gives similar results when the true value has not changed.

    Source: Hopkins, Sports Med 2000 · recall

  3. A device with a fixed offset gives repeatable but biased readings.

    Source: Atkinson & Nevill, Sports Med 1998 · recall

  4. Bias shifts all readings up or down; random error scatters them around the true value.

    Source: Atkinson & Nevill, Sports Med 1998 · recall

  5. It plots the difference between two methods against their mean, showing bias and 95% limits of agreement.

    Source: Bland & Altman, Lancet 1986 · recall

  6. Typical error is the within-subject standard deviation across repeated trials.

    Source: Hopkins, Sports Med 2000 · recall

  7. Correlation measures association, not agreement; one device could read 20% higher throughout.

    Source: Bland & Altman, Lancet 1986 · recall

  8. Expressing error as a percentage lets reliability be compared across different measures.

    Source: Hopkins, Sports Med 2000 · recall

  9. If typical error exceeds the expected improvement, a test cannot detect it reliably.

    Source: Hopkins, Sports Med 2000 · applied

  10. Good reliability supports monitoring trends; the bias rules out direct comparison with the lab.

    Source: Atkinson & Nevill, Sports Med 1998 · applied

Test 2Running Power MetersTake a test

  1. Foot pods and watches estimate power from accelerometers, speed and body mass rather than measuring force.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · recall

  2. Brands model running power differently, so their numbers are not interchangeable.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · recall

  3. The Stryd foot pod showed the best repeatability, while agreement between technologies was poor.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., Eur J Sport Sci 2021 (five running power technologies) · recall

  4. Power responds to gradient faster than heart rate, helping pace hills by effort.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · applied

  5. Tendon recoil and changes in running form mean mechanical estimates relate loosely to energy used.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · recall

  6. Only some systems include an air-resistance estimate, so headwind efforts may be under-reported.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · recall

  7. Running and cycling watts are not equivalent, so each needs its own test.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · recall

  8. Consistency within one device matters more than absolute values.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · applied

  9. Mechanical power in running depends on the mass lifted and accelerated.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · recall

  10. Algorithm changes can shift numbers, so trends across updates need care.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · applied

Test 3Measuring Core TemperatureTake a test

  1. Casa found rectal (and gastrointestinal) measures valid; oral, aural, axillary and temporal were not.

    Source: Casa et al., J Athl Train 2007 · recall

  2. Mouth breathing, fluids and cooling of the ear canal cause large errors against rectal temperature.

    Source: Casa et al., J Athl Train 2007 · recall

  3. The capsule measures gastrointestinal temperature and transmits it wirelessly as it passes through.

    Source: Byrne & Lim, Br J Sports Med 2007 · recall

  4. Taken several hours before, the capsule reaches the intestine and is less affected by cold fluids.

    Source: Byrne & Lim, Br J Sports Med 2007 · recall

  5. Skin temperature responds to air, sweat and blood flow and does not track core reliably.

    Source: Casa et al., J Athl Train 2007 · recall

  6. Non-invasive devices infer core temperature from skin temperature and heat flow, with estimation error.

    Source: Byrne & Lim, Br J Sports Med 2007 · recall

  7. Oral or ear readings can look normal in a hyperthermic athlete, delaying cooling.

    Source: Casa et al., J Athl Train 2007 · recall

  8. Monitoring core temperature helps dose heat acclimation sessions safely and consistently.

    Source: Byrne & Lim, Br J Sports Med 2007 · recall

  9. Each pill is used once and can be affected by food, drink and passage time.

    Source: Byrne & Lim, Br J Sports Med 2007 · recall

  10. Estimates can be wrong; clinical signs and rectal measurement take precedence when heat illness is possible.

    Source: Casa et al., J Athl Train 2007 · applied

Test 4Continuous Glucose MonitorsTake a test

  1. CGMs sample interstitial fluid, not blood or muscle glycogen.

    Source: Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 2024 · recall

  2. Interstitial glucose trails blood glucose, especially when levels change quickly as in exercise.

    Source: Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 2024 · recall

  3. They were developed to help people with diabetes avoid dangerous highs and lows.

    Source: Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 2024 · recall

  4. The liver defends blood glucose, so readings can stay normal while muscle stores run down.

    Source: Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 2024 · applied

  5. Reviews find little evidence that CGM-guided fuelling improves performance in athletes without diabetes.

    Source: Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 2024 · recall

  6. Fast-changing glucose, altered blood flow and sweat can reduce sensor accuracy.

    Source: Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 2024 · recall

  7. Lying on the sensor and calibration limits can produce misleading low readings in healthy people.

    Source: Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 2024 · recall

  8. Normal glucose swings can be over-interpreted, leading to unnecessary eating or worry.

    Source: Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 2024 · applied

  9. Stress hormones prompt liver glucose release that can outpace uptake early in hard efforts.

    Source: Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 2024 · recall

  10. A single reading cannot show glycogen status; symptoms and the planned intake remain the guide.

    Source: Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 2024 · applied

Test 5Muscle Oxygen Sensors (NIRS)Take a test

  1. NIRS uses light absorption to estimate tissue oxygenation, often reported as SmO2.

    Source: Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 2018 · recall

  2. Both pigments absorb near-infrared light similarly, so signals combine.

    Source: Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 2018 · recall

  3. Light must pass through skin and fat; a thicker layer reduces the muscle contribution.

    Source: Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 2018 · recall

  4. Penetration depth is about half the distance between light source and detector.

    Source: Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 2018 · recall

  5. Different muscles and even parts of one muscle behave differently during exercise.

    Source: Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 2018 · recall

  6. Declining oxygen saturation suggests muscle demand exceeds local supply.

    Source: Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 2018 · recall

  7. NIRS breakpoints can coincide with other thresholds on average, but individual agreement varies.

    Source: Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 2018 · recall

  8. Different placement samples different tissue, making comparisons unreliable.

    Source: Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 2018 · recall

  9. Research uses NIRS to study oxygenation, blood flow and mitochondrial capacity non-invasively.

    Source: Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 2018 · recall

  10. NIRS-derived thresholds vary with placement and tissue, so they should be checked against other markers.

    Source: Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 2018 · applied

Test 6Sweat TestingTake a test

  1. A loss of 1 kg of body mass is about 1 litre of sweat, after adjusting for intake and output.

    Source: Baker, Sports Med 2017 · recall

  2. Sweat sodium varies several-fold between individuals, so population averages mislead.

    Source: Baker, Sports Med 2017 · recall

  3. Local sweat often has higher sodium than whole-body sweat; correction equations are used.

    Source: Baker, Sports Med 2017 · recall

  4. Acclimated athletes reabsorb more sodium in the sweat glands, lowering concentration.

    Source: Baker, Sports Med 2017 · recall

  5. Environmental conditions and effort can change sweat rate from under 0.5 to over 2 L per hour.

    Source: Baker, Sports Med 2017 · recall

  6. The sweat chloride test for cystic fibrosis reflects very salty sweat from impaired reabsorption.

    Source: Baker, Sports Med 2017 · recall

  7. Results from cool, low-intensity tests may not apply to a hot, hard race.

    Source: Baker, Sports Med 2017 · applied

  8. Visible salt suggests high sodium loss or high sweat volume, but only a test quantifies it.

    Source: Baker, Sports Med 2017 · recall

  9. Newer wearable patches with correction algorithms show reasonable agreement in studies but are still evolving.

    Source: Baker, Sports Med 2017 · recall

  10. Sweat loss = 1.8 + 0.6 = 2.4 L over 1.5 h, about 1.6 L per hour.

    Source: Baker, Sports Med 2017 · applied

Test 7Measuring Blood LactateTake a test

  1. A capillary blood sample from the finger or earlobe is analysed on a test strip.

    Source: Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 · recall

  2. Devices agreed reasonably with lab analysers but differed from each other, so one device should be used consistently.

    Source: Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 · recall

  3. Sweat has high lactate concentrations, which can falsely raise readings.

    Source: Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 · recall

  4. Differences in circulation and sampling can create systematic gaps between sites.

    Source: Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 · recall

  5. Samples taken too early in a stage may not reflect the steady-state response.

    Source: Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 · recall

  6. Milking the finger pushes interstitial fluid into the drop, lowering and distorting the reading.

    Source: Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 · recall

  7. Only consistent equipment and procedures make changes between tests meaningful.

    Source: Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 · recall

  8. Low glycogen, prior exercise and stage length change lactate at a given intensity.

    Source: Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 · recall

  9. Onset of blood lactate accumulation at 4 mmol/L is a convenient reference that varies in meaning between athletes.

    Source: Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 · recall

  10. Glycogen status changes lactate production, so pre-test diet should be standardised.

    Source: Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 · applied

Test 8Wearable Heart Rate SensorsTake a test

  1. Chest straps detect the ECG signal through electrodes on the skin.

    Source: Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017 · recall

  2. Photoplethysmography uses light absorption to detect pulsatile blood flow.

    Source: Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017 · recall

  3. The chest strap agreed best with ECG; wrist devices varied, especially on the elliptical and arms-involved activities.

    Source: Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017 · recall

  4. Rhythmic motion can be mistaken for the pulse, so the sensor reports cadence.

    Source: Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017 · recall

  5. Vasoconstriction in the cold lowers peripheral blood flow at the wrist.

    Source: Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017 · recall

  6. Movement and water between sensor and skin reduce accuracy in the pool.

    Source: Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017 · recall

  7. Less movement and better contact on the upper arm reduce motion artefacts.

    Source: Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017 · recall

  8. Ink in the skin absorbs light and can interfere with the optical signal.

    Source: Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017 · recall

  9. Dry electrodes and static from clothing can produce spurious readings early on.

    Source: Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017 · recall

  10. Readings near step rate during easy running are a classic sign of cadence lock.

    Source: Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017 · applied

Test 9Satellite and Speed SensorsTake a test

  1. Recording points at intervals and smoothing the track cuts off corners, shortening measured distance.

    Source: Ranacher et al., Int J Geogr Inf Sci 2016 (GPS distance measurement error) · recall

  2. Dual-frequency (multi-band) reception helps reject reflected signals in difficult environments.

    Source: Bowditch, American Practical Navigator (2019) · recall

  3. Multipath reflections lengthen the apparent signal path, causing position errors.

    Source: Bowditch, American Practical Navigator (2019) · recall

  4. Rotations times wheel circumference give distance without satellite errors, if circumference is set correctly.

    Source: Bowditch, American Practical Navigator (2019) · recall

  5. GPS vertical accuracy is poorer than horizontal; pressure sensors track relative height well but drift with weather.

    Source: Bowditch, American Practical Navigator (2019) · recall

  6. A passing weather front changes pressure and appears as a change in height unless recalibrated.

    Source: Bowditch, American Practical Navigator (2019) · recall

  7. Inertial sensors estimate stride and speed; calibration on a known distance improves accuracy.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · recall

  8. Inertial sensors work where GPS cannot reach.

    Source: Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 2020 · recall

  9. An error of 1% in circumference gives a 1% error in all speed and distance data.

    Source: Bowditch, American Practical Navigator (2019) · recall

  10. Certified courses are measured on the shortest line; watch error and running wide add distance.

    Source: Bowditch, American Practical Navigator (2019) · applied

Test 10Reading Sports Science EvidenceTake a test

  1. An unusually poor test is likely to be followed by a better one by chance alone, which can mimic a treatment effect.

    Source: Barnett et al., Int J Epidemiol 2005 · recall

  2. Knowing which treatment is received can create placebo or nocebo effects.

    Source: Hopkins et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 · recall

  3. Participants act as their own controls, which increases sensitivity with small samples.

    Source: Hopkins et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 · recall

  4. Without washout, carry-over from the first treatment can distort the second.

    Source: Hopkins et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 · recall

  5. Randomising conditions repeatedly in one person tests what works for that individual.

    Source: Hopkins et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 · recall

  6. A tiny effect can be statistically significant in a large sample yet irrelevant to athletes.

    Source: Hopkins et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 · recall

  7. Studies showing effects appear more often in print, which inflates perceived benefits.

    Source: Hopkins et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 · recall

  8. Multiple comparisons raise the chance of false positives unless corrected.

    Source: Hopkins et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 · recall

  9. A bad race is often followed by a better one anyway, and belief can improve performance.

    Source: Barnett et al., Int J Epidemiol 2005 · applied

  10. Findings depend on the population, sport and conditions studied.

    Source: Hopkins et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 · applied

Sources

Peer-reviewed sports engineering and physiology literature, with published test data and standards for settled facts

  • Cerezuela-Espejo et al., PLoS One 202011
  • Flockhart & Larsen, Sports Med 202410
  • Perrey & Ferrari, Sports Med 201810
  • Baker, Sports Med 201710
  • Tanner, Fuller & Ross, Eur J Appl Physiol 201010
  • Gillinov et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 201710
  • Hopkins et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc 20098
  • Bowditch, American Practical Navigator (2019)7
  • Casa et al., J Athl Train 20075
  • Byrne & Lim, Br J Sports Med 20075
  • Atkinson & Nevill, Sports Med 19984
  • Hopkins, Sports Med 20004
  • Bland & Altman, Lancet 19862
  • Barnett et al., Int J Epidemiol 20052
  • Cerezuela-Espejo et al., Eur J Sport Sci 2021 (five running power technologies)1
  • Ranacher et al., Int J Geogr Inf Sci 2016 (GPS distance measurement error)1